A Moral Reading of Argentine Constituional Case Law

María del Pilar Zambrano

Autores

María del Pilar Zambrano University of Navarra, Navarra

Palavras-chave:

Derecho Constitucional, Ronald Dworkin, Jurisprudencia, Filosofía del Derecho, Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, Philosophy of Law

Resumo

Resumen: Como han remarcado varias escuelas de filosofía del derecho, la naturaleza abstracta del lenguaje constitucional, significa dejar una puerta abierta para diversas apreciaciones políticas, éticas y filosóficas. En dicha línea, Ronald Dworkin ha sostenido insistentemente que la dimensión creativa, moral y teleológica de la interpretación legal no es excepcional ni separable de una comprensión neutral de las fuentes legales de manera independiente.

Abstract: As has been previously remarked by various legal-philosophical schools of thought, the abstract nature of constitutional language remains an open door to political, ethical, and philosophical assessments. As Ronald Dworkin has insistently sustained that the creative, moral, and teleological dimension of legal interpretation is neither exceptional, nor separable from a neutral understanding of legal sources independently

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia Autor

María del Pilar Zambrano, University of Navarra, Navarra

University of Navarra, Law Faculty, Spainra,

Referências

ALEXY, ROBERT, The Argument From Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism, Litschewski Paulson, B., and Paulson, Stanley, L., (transl.), Oxford University Press, 2002.

BREEN, JOHN M. - SCAPERLANDA, MICHAEL A., «Never Get out the Boat. Stenberg vs. Carhart and the Future of American Law», Connecticut Law Review, 39 (2006).

FINNIS, J., Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford University Press, 2nd. Edition, 2011.

FINNIS, J., Introduction, in: (J. Finnis comp.), Natural Law, Darmouth 1991, Volume I.

FISH, STANLEY, «Working on the Chain Gang», Texas Law Review, 60 (1982).

FISH, STANLEY, «Wrong Again», Texas Law Review, 62 (1983).

CIANCIARDO, J., El principio de razonabilidad. Del debido proceso sustantivo al moderno juicio de proporcionalidad, 2da. Edición, Ábaco, Buenos Aires.

DWORKIN, RONALD, Justices for Hedgeghos, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2011.

DWORKIN, RONALD, Justice in Robes, Cambridge Mass., 2006.

Dworkin, RONALD, Response to Overseas Commentators», International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1 (2003).

DWORKIN, RONALD Freedom´s Law. The Moral Reading of the American Constitution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1996.

DWORKIN, RONALD, Law’s Empire, Harvard University Press, New York 1986.

Dworkin, RONALD, «My Reply to Stanley Fish (and Walter Benn Michaels): Please Don't Talk About Objectivity Any More», in The Politics of Interpretation, (W.J.T. Mitchell ed.), 1983.

DWORKIN, RONALD, Taking Rights Seriously, Duckworth, London 1977.

MARMOR, ANDREI, Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy, Clarendon Press, 1995.

PATTERSON, DENNIS, «Interpretation in Law», San Diego Law Review, 42 (2005).

PEAT, DANIEL, and WINDSOR, MATTHEW, «Playing the Game of Interpretation», in Interpretation in International Law, Oxford University Press, 2015.

RABBI - BALDI CABANILLAS, R., «Consideraciones sobre el sentido de la norma permisiva y prospectivas desde una filosofía del derecho constitucional, a partir del caso ‘F., A. L.’ de la Corte Suprema», Pensar en Derecho, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad

de Buenos Aires, 1 (2012).

RAZ, JOSPEH, «About Morality and the Nature of Law», American Journal of Jurisprudence, 43 (2003).

SADOWSKI, M., «Language is not Life», Connecticut Law Review, 33 (2001).

WEINRIB, JACOB, Dimensions of Dignity. The Theory and Practice of Modern Constitutional Law, Cambridge University Press, 2016.

WROBLEWSKI, JERZY, «Legal Language and Legal Interpretation», Law and Philosophy, 4 (1985).

WRÒBLESKI, JERZY; MAC CORMICK, NEIL, «On Justification and Interpretation», ARSP-Beiheft, 53 (1994).

ZAMBRANO, PILAR, Understanding Human Dignity, or Saving Dignity from Ockam´s Razor, Jurisprudence, Hurt Publications, 2016, 8-1, 143-155.

ZAMBRANO, PILAR, «Fundamental Principles, Realist Semantics and Human Action», Rechtstheorie, 46 (2015).

ZAMBRANO, P., SACRISTÁN, E., «El derecho a la vida y el aborto en la Constitución Argentina», Tratado de Derechos fundamentales, (LEGARRE, S., RIVERA, J., eds.), La Ley, 2014, 655-701.

ZAMBRANO, P., SACRISTÁN, E., «Semantics and Legal Interpretation. A Comparative Study of the Value of Embryonic life under Argentine and U.S. Constitutional Case law», Journal of Civil Law Studies, 6-1 (2013).

ZAMBRANO, PILAR, La inevitable creatividad en la interpretación jurídica. Una aproximación iusfilosófica a la tesis de la discrecionalidad, UNAM, México, 2009.