Enfoques de enseñanza presencial y de enseñanza mixtavirtual-presencial de profesores universitarios de ambas modalidades
Palabras clave:
Concepciones de enseñanza, concepciones de enseñanza mixta, enfoques de enseñanza, rol del profesor, rol del estudiante, estrategias de enseñanza, educación superior.Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar
los enfoques de las concepciones de enseñanza en
aula y de enseñanza mixta de profesores de estas
modalidades educativas. El diseño fue no experimental,
descriptivo, transversal y corte mixto. La
muestra fue de 183 profesores, 129 de cursos cara a
cara y 54 de cursos mixtos que respondieron a preguntas
abiertas relacionadas con el significado de
la enseñanza, del rol del profesor, del rol del estudiante
y de estrategias de enseñanza de cursos cara
a cara y mixtos. Los resultados mostraron que en la
concepción de enseñanza cara a cara y sus dimensiones
de rol del profesor y rol del estudiante en
profesores de cursos cara a cara y mixtos la tendencia
mayor fue hacia el enfoque en aprendizaje. La
concepción de enseñanza de cursos mixtos en
profesores de las dos modalidades educativas se
ubicó fuertemente en un enfoque en enseñanza a
diferencia de sus dimensiones que se focalizaron
en el aprendizaje. A partir de este dato se sugiere
continuar con la investigación en el tema y la
inclusión de las concepciones de enseñanza en los
cursos de formación docente.
Descargas
Citas
Åkerlind, G. (2007). Constraints on academics'
potential for developing as a teacher, Studies in
Higher Education, 32(1), 21-37.
Aydeniz, M. (2009, April).Defining and measuring
science teachers' conceptual ecology for
assessment of students' learning in science.
Trabajo presentado en el Annual International
Meeting of The National Association for
Research in Science Teaching, Garden Grove,
CA, EEUU.
Biggs, J. B. & Moore, P.J. (1993).Process of
learning (3rd Ed). Sydney, Australia: Prentice
Hall.
Buabeng-Andoh, Ch. (2012). Factors influencing
teachers' adoption and integration of
information and communication technology
into teaching: A review of the literature.
International Journal of Education and
Development using Information and
Communication Technology, 8, 136-155.
Bliuc, A.M., Goodyear, P.& Ellis, R.A.
(2007).Research focus and methodological
choices in studies into students' experiences of
blended learning in higher education. The
Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231-244.
Brouwer, N., Ekimova, L., Jasinska, M., Van
Gastel, L. & Virgailaite-Meckauskaite, E.
(2009). Enhancing mathematics by online
assessments, two cases of remedial education
considered. Industry and Higher Education,
(4), 277-284.
Brownlee, J., Purdie, N.& Boulton-Lewis, G.
(2003).An investigation of student teachers'
knowledge about their own learning. Higher
Education, 45(1), 109-125.
Canbay, O. & Beceren, S. (2012). Conceptions of
Teaching Held by the Instructors in English
Language Teaching Departments. Turkish
Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 71-
Chan, K.W. (2003, December). Preservice
teachers' epistemological beliefs and
conceptions about teaching and learning:cultural implications for research in teacher
education. Trabajo presentado en NZARE
AARE conference, Auckland, Nueva
Zelanda.
Chan, K.W. & Elliott, R.G. (2004).Relational
analysis of personal epistemology and
conceptions about teaching and learning.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817-
Chapman, C., Ramondt, L. & Smiley, G. (2005).
Strong community, deep learning: exploring
the link. Innovations in Education and
Teaching International, 42(3), 217-230.
Chen, P.S.D., Lambert, A.D.& Guidry, K.R.
(2010).Engaging online learners: The impact
of Web-based learning technology on
college student engagement. Computers &
Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.
Ellis, R.A., Steed, A.F. & Applebee, A.C.
(2006).Teacher conceptions of blended
learning, blended teaching and associations
with approaches to design. Australasian
Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3),
-335.
Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs:
The final frontier in our quest for technology
integration? Educational Technology
Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
Gao, L. & Watkins, D.A. (2002) Conceptions of
teaching held by school science teachers in
P.R. China: identification and cross cultural
comparisons. International Journal of
Science Education, 24(1), 61-79.
Garrison, D.R.& Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended
learning: Uncovering its transformative
potential in higher education. The Internet
and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
Gilakjani, A.P.& Branch, L. (2012).EFL Teachers'
Beliefs toward Using Computer Technology
in English Language Teaching. Journal of
Studies in Education,2(2), 62-80.
Ginns, P., Kitay, J. & Prosser, M.
(2008).Developing conceptions of teaching
and the scholarship of teaching through a
Graduate Certificate in Higher Education.
The International Journal for Academic
Development, 13, 175-185.
Golombek, P.R. (1998). A study of language
teachers' personal practical knowledge.
TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 447-464.
González, C. (2009). Conceptions of, and
approaches to, teaching online: A study of
lecturers teaching postgraduate distance
courses. Higher Education, 57 (3), 299-31.
González, C. (2010). What do universitary
teachers think e-Learning is good for in this
teaching? Studies in Higher Education, 35(1),
-78.
González, C. (2013). E-teaching in undergraduate
University education and its relationship to
approaches to teaching. Informatics in
education, 12(1), 81-92.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Gijselaers, W.H.,
Segers, M. & Tempelaar, D.T. (2009). Social
presence, web video conferencing and learning
in virtual teams'. Industry and Higher
Education, 23(4), 301-310.
Jarvis, P. (2006). The theory & practice of
teaching. New York, EEUU: Routledge.
Jeffrey, L.M., Milne, J., Suddabay, G.& Higgins,
A. (2012).Research Report. Help or Hindrance:
blended approaches and student engagement.
Publishers Ako Aotearoa National Centre for
Tertiary Teaching Excellence.
Kaleta R., Skibba K. & Joosten T. (2007),
Discovering, Design, and Delivering Hybrid
Course. En A.G. Picciano & C.D. Dziuban
( E d s . ) , B l e n d e d L e a r n i n g R e s e a r c h
Perspectives (pp.111-143). Needam, MA: The
Sloan Consortium.
Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of Distance
Education. EEUU: Rutledge.
Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the
research into academics' conceptions of
teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 255-
Kember, D.& Kwan, K. P. (2000).Lecturers'
approaches to teaching and their relationship to
conceptions of good teaching. Instructional
Science,28(5), 469-490.
Kinchin, I. M. (2012). Avoiding technologyenhanced
non-learning. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 43(2), E43-E48.
Kirwood, A. & Price, L. (2011).Enhancing learning and teaching through technology: a
guide to evidence-based practice for academic
developers. Higher Education Academy, York,
UK.
Könings, K.D., Brand-Gruwel, S. & Van
Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2005).Towards more
powerful learning environments through
combining the perspectives of designers,
teachers, and students. British Journal of
Educational Psychology,75, 645-660.
Kroasbergen, E H. & Van Luit, J.E. (2005).
Constructivist Mathematics Education for
Students with Mental Retardation. European
Journal of Special Needs Education, 20(1), 107-
Laster, S., Otte, G., Picciano, A.G.& Sorg, S.
(2005, April). Redefining blended learning.
Presentation at the Sloan-C Workshop on
Blended Learning, Chicago, IL.
Levin, T. & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teacher's beliefs
and practices in technology-based classrooms:
A developmental view. Journal of Research on
Technology in Education, 39(2), 157-181.
Lindblomm-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A. &
Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching
are affected by discipline and teaching context.
Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285-298.
Mokiwa, H.O. & Msila, J. (2013. Teachers'
Conceptions of Teaching Physical Science in
the Medium of English: A Case Study.
International Journal of Educational Sciences,
(1), 55-66.
Moreno, J.A., Rodríguez, N.M.C. & Padilla, V.M.
(2010).Cuestionario de Preguntas Abiertas
sobre Concepciones de Enseñanza y
Aprendizaje (no publicado).
Palak, D. & Walls, R.T. (2009).Teachers' Beliefs
and Technology Practices: A Mixed-methods
Approach. Journal of Research on Technology
in Education, 42(4), 417-441.
Pratt, D.D. (1992). Chinese conceptions of
learning and teaching: A westerner´s attempt al
understanding. International Journal of
Lifelong Education, 11(4), 301-319.
Postareff, L., Katajavuori, N., Lindblom-Ylänne,
S. & Trigwell, K. (2008).Consonance and
dissonance in descriptions of teaching of
university teachers. Studies in Higher
Education, 33(1), 49-61.
Prosatreff, L., Lindbloom-Ylänne, S. & Nevgi, A.
(2007).The effect of pedagogical training on
teaching in higher education. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 23, 557-571
Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (2001).Understanding
Learning and Teaching: The Experience of
Higher Education. The Society for Research
into Higher Education, Buckingham.
Ramsden, P., Prosser, M., Trigwell, K. & Martin,
E. (2007).University teachers' experiences of
academic leadership and their approaches to
teaching, Learning and Instruction, 17, 140-
Smith, L. (2006).Teachers' conceptions of
teaching at a Gulf university: A starting point
for revising a teacher development program.
Learning and Teaching in Higher Education:
Gulf Perspectives, 1. Recuperado de
http://www.zu.ac.ae/lthe/vol3no1/documents/l
the03_01_02.htm.
Tsai, C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science
teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and
science. International Journal of Science
Education, 24(8), 771-783.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M.& Waterhouse, F.
(1999).Relations between teachers' approaches
to teaching and students' approaches to
learning. Higher Education,37, 57-90.
Van Merriënboer, J.J. G. & Paas, F. (2003).
Powerful learning and the many faces of
instructional design: Towards a framework for
the design of powerful learning environments.
In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle &
J.J.G. Van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful
learning environments: Unraveling basic
components and dimensions (pp. 3-20).
Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
Vermunt, J. D. & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns
in student learning: Relationships between
learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and
learning orientations. Educational Psychology
Review, 29(4), 359-384.
Voogt, J. (2008). IT and the curriculum processes:
Dilemmas and challenges. En J. Voogt & G.
Knezek (Eds.), International Handbook ofInformation Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 117-132). New York,
EEUU: Springer.
White, R. (1994). Commentary: Conceptual and
Conception Change. Learning and Instruction,
, 117-121.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
